Well about three days ago, I had a post about Osama bin Laden. I posted how he, in his video message to the U.S.- how he has many of the same interests and talking points as MOVE ON.ORG!
Everything from global warming to his glowing references to noam chumpsky.
He even expresses his frustrations at the dems for not being able to end the war. Seemingly the dems seem to be his party of choice. No big surprise to me, being that he SPEWS the same kind of crap that comes out of the 'daily kos' and 'move on.org'.
HE SOUNDS LIKE A LEFTIST.
Now that said, When it came down to countsy writing up a reply, he simply says:(in its entirety)
countsy::
"""This one's too laughable to even deal with. Steve, your little rants are going so far off the rails now, you're becoming a parody of a joke. If Crazy 'Lil Stevie still has some friends out there, throw this poor bastard a life line soon.""
That's it. Notice how there is not one word about the substance of my post. Now he'll say "Well!! That's because there IS none. Nonsense. If I say he (osama) sounds like a leftist and shares the same view points..AND then I give examples of that...THAT'S substance baby!
What is REALLY telling, Is that they are now saying that there is great reason to think that much of Osama's speach was fashioned by the American turned militant islamist; adam gudahn who ABSOLUTLY IS a leftist. Straight out of.......California.
But No...Countsy doesn't answer my points because he cant. He would have to admit that, YEAH...Osama DOES sound like a leftist. YEAH..Osama DOES have the same interests.
And YEAH...that I'm right.
Comon countsy. Fess up. I got'cha. Would you like me to link the transcript for you? Just so you can be sure that your voting for someone that has all of your values. You don't wanna cast your vote for someone that has even a smidge of a different mindset than yourself. I mean, He's a fan of chomsky!! YOU GOTTA LOOOOOVE THAT!
I know that I do! :)
The second thing that I want to bring up is my post on the 11Th. My tribute to 9-11.
Countsy had a reply to it.
basically stating that the country is in trouble because I (Handel) "attack fellow Americans"
countsy::
"""I would rather attack Osama Bin Laden.
.... I know who our enemies are. They're not my fellow countrymen. Not even the ones I don't like."""
Countsy is a small thinker. And believe me, that's me being generous. What is worse than evil people who do evil things?
Answer: People who let them. People who look the other way. People who try and appease the evil and evil people.
The modern day democrat is a leftist by and large. A FAR leftist. Who do not care about this country. Who in great measure, don't even believe that there IS such thing as "EVIL".
And until one does admit to themselves that 'EVIL' exists, those people will glom onto Ideologies such as Communism,Socialism, Marxism and Fascism.
You will hold people such as Stalin, Castro, Che Guevara, and Arafat up as freedom fighters and great visionaries.
You will be more likely to have a twisted moral compass where "relativism" is your norm. Therefore making it easy to make idiotic statements like "Bush is worse than Hitler".
The Boy Scouts and Christianity become your idea of bad while those bastards that send out clueless children with bombs strapped to their bodies- with hopes to blow up as many people as possible at a popular Israeli hangout....become your idea of people who you should sympathize with.
Yeah..I attack those that are leftist. Because they are setting us up for another attack. They in their disdain for this country (all while taking full advantage of the perks of living in it) are doing everything they can to weaken it.
Let me ask you countsy. You have every NUTTER website linked on your blog. One of those of course being, "moveon.org".
How do you feel about that dumb ass organization attacking General Patraeus the way they did?
Are you embarrassed by it? You should be. But you probably aren't. Because in true leftist fashion, You probably agree with 'moveon'. In your view (and moveons) you probably think of Petraeus as the enemy. More so than you think of the terrorists that he is fighting the good fight against.
Right, countsy?
(((CHIRP CHIRP CHIRP)))
Hellooooo?
I'd ask robo the same questions? But I have a feeling that he's wanting to steer clear of any and all of this. You really cant defend the indefensible. So my guess is that he's under the bed on this one.
How pragmatic.
And just for the record countsy. You don't remember the victims of 9-11, by choosing to surrender to the enemy. That isn't doing them justice.
That's saying that they're lives didn't mean shit. Or possibly you have the same view as your fellow leftist Ward Churchill, likening the victims of 9-11 to "little Eichmann's". "Non Innocents".
No sir. IF you choose to run from evil, then you do NOT remember the victims with honor.
And why ARE leftists so quick to run from evil? Because remember..they don't believe in evil.
BROKEN, TWISTED, MORAL COMPASS.
You've been served your ass, countsy. Would you like a spoon or a fork?
Bon appetite.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke